Industrial Relations Essay -- Politics, Bipartite Relationships

I.INTRODUCTIONIndustrial peace is one of the core issues in the report of industrial traffic. Moore (1951) suggested that industrial conflicts plunder be minimized or prevented by resort to two types of procedures first, a procedure of regulating and limiting the place of the two interest groups, especially by restricting supply that can be exercised second, a procedure of providing positive interference in industrial disputes. Both procedures suggest that beyond workers and employers, a third important participant may also directly interfere in industrial relations processes.The Pluralist theory, the mainstream industrial relations theory, focuses primarily on the bipartite relationship among the workers and employers. The third player, governmental agencies, though is equally important, is largely overlooked (Keller, 1991). However, as a theory of politics in essence, the Pluralist theory requires considerable expanding upon on such a missing piece, for it leaves itself ope n to questions of inequality of power among different interest groups some groups may wield an influence on public policy which may not be the interest of opposite groups. Legislation and other public policy decisions oftentimes work through with(predicate) a complex process of political party structure (Hameed, 1982). authorities is one of the most important underlying developmental dynamic indoors industrial relations as such governmental interference shall not be absent from existing theoretical frameworks.The primary objective of this piece of music is to examine the Pluralist theory focusing on its explanation on the aim of governmental agencies in industrial relations. Furthermore, I hope to prove that the absence seizure of the role of the state may be a theoretical faulting within Pluralis... ...on McGuinty is being a lapdog for a union-hating right-wing mayor because he is afraid of Fords political clout, not because he cares about transit in Toronto. (CBC News, 30 March, 2011)Though these statements may be purely Mr. Kinnears grammatical construction of personal interests, one interesting fact about this dispute is that, TTC attention and TTC employees in fact unanimously oppose this provision. Management fear the unwitting consequence of governmental intervention will reversely cause high wage, TTC employees worry that they may lose their right to strike as a powerful channel to articulate themselves. All in all, it is without a dubiety that government actively involves in this industrial conflict, and pluralism theory again, fails to explain why government has taken such an active role in meddlesome labour relations between TTC management and employees.